UNSW home
 Research 

 

 RESEARCH

 

» Achievements
» ARC Photovoltaics
Centre of Excellence

» Systems & Industry
 Research

» Publications
» Useful Information

 

Quick Links

 

»MyUNSW

Australian Research Council

Department of State and Regional Development

 

ARC Photovoltaics Centre of Excellence

 

Third Generation Photovoltaics

Selective Energy Contacts

The property of a narrow selected energy transmission range, dE, is a key requirement in choosing a suitable contact structure. dE should be kept small to approach the entropic ideal, but remain large enough to support the appropriate rate of carrier extraction. Other properties of possibly critical interest are the ease of manufacture of the structures and, for the ‘hot lattice’ approach (see Hot Lattice), the thermal insulation.

Figure 1: Resonant tunnelling through a single discrete level in a double barrier at close to zero bias.

Quantum mechanical tunnelling structures seem most likely to satisfy the first of these requirements with resonant tunnelling as the most appropriate. Resonance, in this context, refers to a high level of electron transmission within the range of resonant energies with low transmission outside this range. The quality of resonance is evidenced by the narrowness of the transmission range. This offers the possibility of very good energy selection.

The simplest tunnelling structure is a single barrier. This does not have any energy selection properties as the tunnelling probability increases monotonically with carrier energy. Figure 1 shows a structure which does have the desired resonant property. The device is shown at close to zero bias, as this is the optimal condition for operation of a selective energy contact. A strong resonance in transmission occurs at an energy corresponding to that of the discrete level, Es , within the barrier region. The allowed discrete level can be created as a quantised level in a quantum well (QW), a quantum dot (QD) or, most simply, as a defect level.

However, any QW structure suffers from an inherent problem. QW energy levels are only confined in the longitudinal direction, that perpendicular to the plane of the QW. In the plane of the well, the normal band structure of the bulk material dominates and there are allowed states at all energies above the first confined level. This means that hot carriers at the resonant energy entering the structure at a perfect right angle to this plane will be transmitted effectively. However, other carriers with longitudinal energy at the resonant energy but also with any additional component of momentum in either transverse direction can also be transmitted, even though total energy falls outside the selective energy window. Thus good energy selection is lost and furthermore the energy of hot carriers is squandered in phonon interactions in the plane of the contacting structure.

Figure 2: Impurity defects randomly spaced in a barrier material. The defect potential is the sum of the atomic and barrier potentials. Tunnelling probability is strongly peaked for states that happen to be in a resonant position.

Total energy confinement can be achieved in the quantum dot version of Fig.1, with the QW replaced by a plane of quantum dots, QDs. Such structures are being fabricated as part of the Centre's work on silicon nanostructures. These are being characterised with respect to QD size, uniformity and density with TEM, SPM, Raman and photo-luminescence. Further experiments are being carried out on electronic transport with respect to carrier energy. These will lead to optimisation of the structures for narrow selective energy ranges.

An alternative method for achieving total energy confinement in a structure such as that in Fig.1 is to have multiple defects or impurities in a barrier oxide, Fig. 2. The tunnelling probability is then strongly peaked for states in a resonant position. Hence resonance will automatically be greatest for the defects that happen to be in this resonant position. (For the symmetrical case this will be such that the barrier widths are equal, i.e. for states physically near the centre of the barrier.) This makes such a device conceptually easy to fabricate with an MIM or MOS type of structure with defects randomly spaced in the insulator, providing defect density is high enough and there is even dispersion.

1D tunnelling calculations for the structure in Fig. 2 have been carried out. These will be extended to model the 3D situation of a real device and matched to empirical data. This will yield a simple predictive model for defect potentials.

return to Hot Carrier Cells

Hot Carrier Absorbers

Authorised by: SPREE | UNSW Sydney NSW 2052 Australia | Enquiries: pv.labs@unsw.edu.au
CRICOS CODE: 00098G | Disclaimer | ©UNSW | Ph: (02) 9385 4018 | Sitemap